What HR Leaders Really Think About the Employment Rights Act 2025

We recently explored how the Employment Rights Act 2025 is reshaping expectations for employers across the UK and why culture is becoming a central part of how organisations respond.

The legislation introduces clear structural changes to how businesses manage people. It raises the baseline for fairness, consistency, and employee protection. It also introduces additional pressure for leaders, particularly within small and medium-sized businesses where resources are already stretched.

What is becoming increasingly clear is that the real impact of these changes is not theoretical. It is already being felt in conversations between HR professionals, consultants, and business leaders.

To understand this more deeply, we gathered insight from a group of HR and people consultants working closely with UK organisations. Their perspectives point to a consistent theme; the Act is not being viewed as a simple policy shift, it is being seen as something that exposes, tests, and in some cases reshapes workplace culture.

A mirror more than a solution

One of the strongest signals coming through is that the legislation will not directly improve culture. Instead, it will reveal what is already in place.

Sophie Haylock, Founder and Director of Early Years HR, said:

“From speaking to my clients and my wider networking groups, I think that the ERA 2025 acts far more like a mirror than a lever. If a culture is already strong, these changes won’t fundamentally shift behaviour or relationships.”

Debbie Davidson, Director & Lead Consultant of Davidson HR Associates, shares a similar view. She said:

“The Employment Rights Act 2025 is going to do what legislation always does: it’ll expose what’s already there. 

“The organisations I work with that have sweated the small stuff – treating people as their most valuable resource, paying fairly, being honest about hours, pay and being forward thinking about developmental practises and procedures – are mostly going to look at the updates, want to do their best, stay compliant and shrug. 

“The fundamentals are already in place; the legislation just formalises what they’re already doing (likely with some tweaks).”

Where culture is already strong, the changes are unlikely to disrupt how people experience work. Where there are existing issues such as inconsistency, low trust, or unclear expectations, those issues are likely to become more visible and more difficult to ignore.

This reinforces a simple reality, culture determines whether change feels manageable or disruptive.

A shift in perceived trust between employers and employees

Another theme emerging from consultants is the sense that the legislation changes the tone of the employer and employee relationship, particularly in how fairness and consistency are experienced day to day.

Karen Orr, Founder and Director of Peoplewise Solutions, said:

“[The legislation] will act as a mirror first because the reforms touch the parts of working life where the tone of a workplace is felt most directly. Things like sickness absence, flexible working, raising concerns and dismissals are where people notice whether an organisation is fair, consistent and competent.”

She also highlights how this shifts over time:

“Over time, the Act also becomes a lever because, especially for SMEs, the room for error gets smaller. Leaders will need to be more structured, more consistent and more careful.”

This introduces an important dynamic. While the legislation may begin by revealing existing behaviours, it gradually starts to shape them.

As expectations tighten, leaders are likely to feel increased pressure to formalise decision making and reduce inconsistency. In smaller organisations, where informal relationships are often part of the culture, this shift can be particularly noticeable.

Over time, this has a direct impact on how culture is experienced. What was previously flexible and situational becomes more structured and process-driven, which can either create clarity or introduce friction depending on how it is implemented.

Where the impact will be felt most

From a practical perspective, the impact of the legislation is expected to be felt most in how businesses structure their people policies.

Sarah Birkenshaw, CEO of Quest Consulting Services, said:

“While many legislative changes simply mirror the current social climate, the 2025 Act acts as a lever because it forces a structural shift in how SMEs must value and manage their “human capital” from day one.

For many SMEs, “culture” has historically been informal, built on trust and “getting stuck in.” However, the Act introduces high-stakes consequences for maintaining that informality.”

As expectations tighten, these moments become more visible. What may previously have been accepted as informal or inconsistent becomes harder to justify.

This raises the standard expected from managers and leaders. It also reduces the margin for inconsistency across teams.

Increased pressure on SMEs

A consistent concern across multiple contributors is the need for small and medium-sized businesses to adapt their processes and thinking to remain compliant, however the direct impact of the legislation is expected to vary depending on current processes.

Diane Birch, Managing Director of Get Vantage, said:

“Greater awareness of rights almost always leads to an increase in employees raising concerns. That isn’t necessarily a negative development; in healthy organisations it can simply mean people feel safe to speak up and issues are resolved internally before they escalate.

“However, the impact will vary significantly depending on the organisation’s culture.”

She goes on to explain:

“In organisations with strong, transparent and trusting cultures, concerns are often dealt with early through open conversations, so formal grievances remain relatively low.

“In organisations with toxic or low-trust cultures, we are likely to see more grievances raised. Employees today are also far more informed than in the past, with social media and online advice making them more aware of what to look out for and how to challenge poor practices.”

Kath O’Rourke, HR & People Consultant from Tide HR agreed by saying:

“If a business already has good people management, fair processes, and managers who handle issues openly and consistently, the changes probably won’t feel too disruptive. 

“But where things are more informal or inconsistent, the Act will expose those gaps quite quickly.”

While increased structure can improve consistency, it can also change the feel of an organisation if not introduced carefully, especially if that organisation had previously moved quickly and had a loose structure around its HR strategy.

Reduced agility for small businesses

The increased structure and process around HR policies is expected to be uncomfortable for all organisations, but mostly felt by smaller organisations, where the ability to move quickly is a competitive advantage.

Bekka Prideaux, Leadership Development and Change Management Coach and Consultant, summarised this by saying:

“[We’ll see] less flexibility and less agility. For larger organisations, that’s uncomfortable. For smaller businesses, whose greatest strength is their ability to adapt quickly and personally, it’s a more significant shift. 

“The impact will be felt more acutely where agility has always been the competitive edge.”

Bekka adds that:

“There’s also nowhere to hide. Weak processes will be exposed. If your documentation is patchy, your consistency non-existent, or your managers winging difficult conversations, the Act will surface these issues, and they become organisational risks with legal consequences.

“Depending on your start point, that could feel like a threat. Or,and this is the reframe I’d invite you to consider, it could be an opportunity.”

Increased training requirements

Some consultants are predicting that the new legislation is going to cause some organisations to undertake management training to ensure compliance.

Diane Birch said:

“The new legislation will encourage leadership teams to recognise that training managers and creating a positive workplace culture isn’t optional. It’s fundamental to getting the best from people, maintaining trust, and avoiding unnecessary disputes. 

“Organisations that invest in these areas will not only remain compliant but will also see stronger engagement and performance from their teams.”

While this training is initially intended to address short-term operational concerns, it introduces opportunity for wider workplace improvements at the same time.

A consistent theme of opportunity

Despite the challenges, there is a consistent sense that the legislation creates an opportunity for organisations that approach it in the right way.

Karen Orr said:

“[The new rules] encourage robust basics: clear expectations, reasonable process and consistent decisions. Those are the foundations of fair treatment and employees should be able to rely on them.”

When employees understand expectations, see consistency in decision making, and feel that processes are applied fairly, it reduces friction.

It creates a more stable environment where people can focus on their work rather than navigating uncertainty.

What this means for organisations

Taken together, these perspectives provide a clear picture of how the Employment Rights Act 2025 is being received within the HR community.

It is not being seen as a simple compliance exercise. It is being viewed as a catalyst that will expose existing cultural strengths and weaknesses.

For organisations, the challenge is not just to implement new policies. It is to ensure that the way those policies are delivered strengthens rather than disrupts the employee experience.

Those that respond with a purely operational mindset may find themselves introducing friction, slowing decision making, and creating distance between leaders and employees.

Those that use this moment to build clarity, consistency, and trust into their culture are more likely to see long-term benefits. Not just in compliance, but in productivity, retention, and overall performance.

As the views from across the industry suggest, the legislation itself does not define the outcome; how organisations respond to it will.